288 F.3d 375 (9th Cir. 2002), 99-56887, Daniel v. County of Santa Barbara

This document cites

• US Code - 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
• Federal Cases - Hall v. City of Santa Barbara
• Federal Cases - First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, California
• Federal Cases - Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Co.
• Federal Cases - McBride v. PLM Intern., Inc.



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Natural Resources Defense Council v. Houston
• Federal Cases - Carson Harbor Village Ltd. v. City of Carson
• Federal Cases - Armendariz v. Penman, s. 93-55393
• Federal Cases - Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
• Federal Cases - Ellis v. City of San Diego, Cal.
• Federal Cases - Daniel v. CTY. OF SANTA BARBARA, 99-56887.
• Michigan - Tolksdorf v. Griffith
• Federal Cases - Christensen v. Yolo County Bd. of Sup'rs, No. 91-16163
• Federal Cases - Palazzolo v Rhode Island
• Federal Cases - Yee v. City of Escondido, California
• Federal Cases - U.S. v. 30.54 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Greene County, Com. of Pa., s. 95-3237
• Federal Cases - WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller, 93-55917
• Federal Cases - Schnuck v. City of Santa Monica
• Federal Cases - Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
• Federal Cases - Sinclair Oil Corp. v. County of Santa Barbara
• Federal Cases - Daniel v. County of Santa Barbara
• Federal Cases - Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm Desert
• Federal Cases - Williamson v. General Dynamic
• Federal Cases - Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi Valley
• Federal Cases - San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco
• Federal Cases - Burgert v. Pauahi Bishop Trust
• Federal Cases - Armstrong v. United States
• California - County of San Diego v. Miller
• Federal Cases - Nollan v. California Coastal Commission