285 A.2d 59 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1971), Bennett v. T & F Distributing Co.

Citation: 285 A.2d 59, 117 N.J.Super. 439

Opinion Judge: [11] Lynch

Party Name: Miriam BENNETT and Charles Bennett, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. T & F DISTRIBUTING CO., otherwise known as Kirby Sales & Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and Kirby Vacuum Corp., the City of Neptune and the Scott and Fetzer Co. Defendants-Respondents.

Attorney: [6] Mr. Philip G. Auerbach argued the cause for respondents Miriam Bennett and Charles Bennett (Messrs. Drazin, Warshaw, Auerbach & Rudnick, attorneys; Mr. Robert T. Winter on the brief).

Case Date: Thursday December 16, 1971

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

285 A.2d 59 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1971), Bennett v. T & F Distributing Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Michigan - 172 N.W.2d 56 (Mich.App. 1969), 5181, Hersh v. Kentfield Builders, Inc.
Michigan - 46 N.W.2d 382 (Mich. 1951), 2, Bradley v. Stevens
New Jersey - 138 A.2d 762 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1958), No. A--64, Miklos v. Liberty Coach Co., Inc.
New Jersey - 153 A.2d 321 (N.J. 1959), A--139, Majestic Realty Associates, Inc. v. Toti Contracting Co.
New Jersey - 249 A.2d 65 (N.J. 1969), A--15, Jackson v. Muhlenberg Hospital

See all quotations