28 Cal.App.3d 574, 1839, Duran v. Cassidy

Citation: 28 Cal.App.3d 574, 104 Cal.Rptr. 793

Opinion Judge: [9] Franson

Party Name: Duran v. Cassidy

Attorney: [6] Kenneth E. Conn for Petitioners. [7] Richard B. Isham, City Attorney, for Respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday November 08, 1972

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

28 Cal.App.3d 574, 1839, Duran v. Cassidy

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites