28 A.2d 844 (Conn. 1942), Paley v. Palmer

Citation: 28 A.2d 844, 129 Conn. 392

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: PALEY v. PALMER et al.

Attorney: Samuel E. Friedman and Irwin E. Friedman, both of Bridgeport, for appellant. Edwin H. Hall, of New Haven (James W. Grady, of New Haven, on the brief), for appellee.

Judge Panel: Before MALTBIE, C.J., and JENNINGS, ELLS, DICKENSON, and INGLIS, JJ.

Case Date: Tuesday November 10, 1942

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

28 A.2d 844 (Conn. 1942), Paley v. Palmer

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 118 A. 446 (Conn. 1922), Godfrey v. Connecticut Co.
Connecticut - 120 A. 300 (Conn. 1923), Firszt v. Capitol Park Realty Co.
Connecticut - 123 A. 124 (Conn. 1924), Dibble v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co.
Connecticut - 149 A. 127 (Conn. 1930), Belledeau v. Connecticut Co.
Connecticut - 189 A. 876 (Conn. 1937), Sickmund v. Connecticut Co.

See all quotations