276 Cal.App.2d 419, 33641, Rodde v. Trousdale Const. Co.

Citation: 276 Cal.App.2d 419, 80 Cal.Rptr. 774

Opinion Judge: [10] Lillie

Party Name: Rodde v. Trousdale Const. Co.

Attorney: [7] Musick, Peeler & Garrett and Bruce Clark for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Schell & Delamer, Douglas W. Richardson, Russell & Schureman, Robert W. Hancock, Murchison, Cumming, Baker & Velpmen, Ronald R. McQuoid, Miller, Vandegrift, Middleton & Sackin, Thomas J. Middleton, Gibson, Dunn & Crut...

Case Date: September 25, 1969

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

276 Cal.App.2d 419, 33641, Rodde v. Trousdale Const. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 42 Cal.2d 848, 22493, Hayashi v. Lorenz
California - 65 Cal.2d 88, 28758, General Motors Corp. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California - 68 Cal.2d 802, 29516, Weeks v. Roberts
California - 11 Cal.App. 155, Civ. 546, Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.
California - 119 Cal.App.2d 51, 4513, Gurst v. San Diego Transit System

See all quotations