275 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2001), 00-16021, Bradley v. Harris Research

Citation: 275 F.3d 884

Party Name: MICHAEL BRADLEY, DBA CHEM-DRY OF CAMPBELL/SARATOGA; PATRICIA SMITH BRADLEY, DBA CHEM-DRY OF CAMPBELL/SARATOGA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. HARRIS RESEARCH, INC., A UTAH CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Case Date: December 28, 2001

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

275 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2001), 00-16021, Bradley v. Harris Research

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 2 Validity, Irrevocability, and Enforcement of Agreements to Arbitrate
US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 4 Failure to Arbitrate Under Agreement; Petition to United States Court Having Jurisdiction For Order to Compel Arbitration; Notice and Service Thereof; Hearing and Determination
Federal Cases - Michael v. NAP Consumer Electronics Corp., Civ. No. 83-0232 (TR).
Federal Cases - Laxmi Investments v. Golf USA., 98-15758
California - Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps

See all quotations