275 Cal.App.2d 918, 33594, Harriman v. City of Beverly Hills

Citation: 275 Cal.App.2d 918, 80 Cal.Rptr. 426

Opinion Judge: [9] The Court

Party Name: Harriman v. City of Beverly Hills

Attorney: [7] Miller, Vandegrift, Middleton & Sackin, Louis A. Sackin and Robert Hillison for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Allen Grimes, City Attorney, and Colin Lennard, Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: August 27, 1969

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

275 Cal.App.2d 918, 33594, Harriman v. City of Beverly Hills

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 161 Cal. 220, Crim. 1690, Ex Parte Quong Wo on Habeas Corpus
California - 166 Cal. 7, L. A. 3425, Pasadena School District v. City of Pasadena
California - 172 Cal. 230, L. A. 3609, Curtis v. City of Los Angeles
California - 195 Cal. 477, L. A. 8012, Miller v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles
California - 22 Cal.2d 494, 17734, People v. Western Fruit Growers

See all quotations