273 Cal.App.2d 84, 9225, Hamm v. City of Santa Ana

Citation: 273 Cal.App.2d 84, 78 Cal.Rptr. 102

Opinion Judge: [10] Mccabe

Party Name: Hamm v. City of Santa Ana

Attorney: [7] William L. Mock, City Attorney, and James A. Withers, Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Richard R. Murphy for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday May 16, 1969

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

273 Cal.App.2d 84, 9225, Hamm v. City of Santa Ana

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Arkansas - 245 S.W.2d 822 (Ark. 1952), 4-9673, Rider v. City of Batesville
California - 175 Cal. 441, L. A. 5028, Civic Center Association of Los Angeles v. Railroad Commission of State
California - 6 Cal. 26, People v. Porter
California - 104 Cal.App. 647, Civ. 5872, Matteson v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles
California - 30 Cal.App. 424, Civ. 1890, People ex rel. Webb v. Marsh

See all quotations