271 N.Y. 444, Rohlfs v. Weil

Citation: 271 N.Y. 444, 3 N.E.2d 588

Opinion Judge: O'BRIEN, Judge.

Party Name: ROHLFS et al. v. WEIL et al.

Attorney: John V. Downey, James B. McNally, and Francis J. MacIntyre, all of New York City, for appellant Strauss & Co. Bertrand L. Pettigrew and William Felstiner, both of New York City, for appellant Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. Edward Ward McMahon and John F. Kiernan, both of New York City, for respondents.

Judge Panel: LEHMAN and FINCH, JJ., dissenting in part. LEHMAN, Judge (dissenting in part). HUBBS, CROUCH, and LOUGHRAN, JJ., concur with O'BRIEN, J. CRANE, C. J., concurs in the result on the ground that the Gotham Silk Hosiery Company and Strauss & Co. were engaged in a joint enterprise. LEHMAN, J., dissent...

Case Date: Wednesday July 08, 1936

Court: New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals