271 Cal.App.2d 845, 11547, Peacock v. Sacramento County

Citation: 271 Cal.App.2d 845, 77 Cal.Rptr. 391

Opinion Judge: [10] Janes

Party Name: Peacock v. Sacramento County

Attorney: [7] Gale & Goldstein and Stanley J. Gale for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] John B. Heinrich, County Counsel, and Thomas A. Darling, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant.

Case Date: Wednesday April 16, 1969

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

271 Cal.App.2d 845, 11547, Peacock v. Sacramento County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 166 Cal. 640, S. F. 6499, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (A Corporation) v. Eshleman
California - 38 Cal.2d 825, 6136, Anderson v. Souza
California - 161 Cal.App.2d 454, 22678, Kissinger v. City of Los Angeles
California - 212 Cal.App.2d 345, 20289, Frustuck v. City of Fairfax
California - 218 Cal.App.2d 205, 7054, Sneed v. Riverside County

See all quotations