27 N.E. 898 (Ohio 1891), Kirker v. City of Cincinnati

Citation: 27 N.E. 898, 48 Ohio St. 507

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: KIRKER v. CITY OF CINCINNATI.

Attorney: Burch & Johnson, Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly , and Ramsey, Maxwell & Ramsey , for plaintiff in error. Theodore Horstman , City Sol., and J. B. Foraker , for defendant in error.

Case Date: Tuesday June 30, 1891

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

27 N.E. 898 (Ohio 1891), Kirker v. City of Cincinnati

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 12 N.E. 829 (Ohio 1886), State ex rel. Herron v. Smith
Ohio - 26 N.E. 1069 (Ohio 1891), State ex rel. Reemelin v. Smith
Ohio - 26 N.E. 717 (Ohio 1890), Reemilin v. Mosby
Ohio - 7 N.E. 447 (Ohio 1886), State ex rel. Herron v. Smith
Ohio - 12 Ohio 16 (Ohio 1843), State ex rel. Whitbeck v. Alling

See all quotations