27 A.3d 395 (Conn.App. 2011), 32818, Hirschfeld v. Machinist

Citation: 27 A.3d 395, 131 Conn.App. 364

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: Caroline HIRSCHFELD v. Robert B. MACHINIST.

Attorney: Kenneth A. Votre, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff). Kenneth J. Bartschi, Hartford, with whom were Dana M. Hrelic and, on the brief, Arnold Rutkin, Westport, for the appellee (defendant).

Judge Panel: BISHOP, BEAR and PELLEGRINO, Js.

Case Date: September 13, 2011

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

27 A.3d 395 (Conn.App. 2011), 32818, Hirschfeld v. Machinist

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 685 A.2d 1108 (Conn. 1996), 15334, CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury
Connecticut - 735 A.2d 333 (Conn. 1999), 15930, State v. Salmon
Connecticut - 850 A.2d 133 (Conn. 2004), 16394, Maris v. McGrath
Connecticut - 853 A.2d 642 (Conn.App. 2004), 24537, Roose v. Roose
Connecticut - 871 A.2d 380 (Conn.App. 2005), 25284, Statewide Grievance Committee v. Burton

See all quotations