265 Cal.App.2d 637, 8854, Hoover v. Emerald

Citation: 265 Cal.App.2d 637, 71 Cal.Rptr. 500

Opinion Judge: [10] Coughlin

Party Name: Hoover v. Emerald

Attorney: [7] Harelson, Enright, Levitt & Knutson and Gerald M. Dawson for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] McInnis, Focht & Fitzgerald and William T. Fitzgerald for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday September 11, 1968

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

265 Cal.App.2d 637, 8854, Hoover v. Emerald

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 47 Cal.2d 348, 5856, People v. Crooker
California - 62 Cal.2d 470, 21891, Reuther v. Viall
California - 68 Cal.2d 104, 22549, Mercer v. Perez
California - 258 Cal.App.2d 362, 24047, Matlock v. Farmers Mercantile Co.
California - 259 Cal.App.2d 733, 23842, Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

See all quotations