264 P.2d 835 (Ariz. 1953), 5675, Tang v. Avitable

Citation: 264 P.2d 835, 76 Ariz. 346

Opinion Judge: [9] Udall

Party Name: TANG et al. v. AVITABLE.

Attorney: [6] Hugh M. Caldwell, and Conner & Jones, Tucson, for appellants. [7] Darnell, Robertson & Holesapple, and Thomas Chandler, Tucson, for appellee.

Case Date: Monday December 14, 1953

Court: Arizona Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

264 P.2d 835 (Ariz. 1953), 5675, Tang v. Avitable

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Arizona - 127 P. 746 (Ariz. 1912), Crim. 312, Schaffer v. Territory of Arizona
Arizona - 62 P. 693 (Ariz. 1900), Crim. 142, Tamborino v. Territory of Arizona
Arizona - 64 P. 492 (Ariz. 1901), Crim. 142, Tamborino v. Territory of Arizona
Arizona - 106 P.2d 488 (Ariz. 1940), Civ. 4198, Posner v. New York Life Insurance Co.
Arizona - 156 P.2d 898 (Ariz. 1945), Civ. 4590, Branker v. Bowman

See all quotations