26 Cal.App.4th 217, A061040, Foxborough v. Van Atta

Citation: 26 Cal.App.4th 217, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525

Opinion Judge: [10] Chin

Party Name: Foxborough v. Van Atta

Attorney: [7] Ronald R. Rossi and Susan R. Reischl; Liccardo, Rossi, Sturges & McNeil, San Jose, California for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] James M. Hanavan and Diane R. Crowley; Gordon & Rees, San Francisco, California for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday June 28, 1994

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

26 Cal.App.4th 217, A061040, Foxborough v. Van Atta

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites