259 Cal.App.2d 860, 31098, Denham v. Los Angeles County

Citation: 259 Cal.App.2d 860, 66 Cal.Rptr. 922

Opinion Judge: [10] Aiso

Party Name: Denham v. Los Angeles County

Attorney: [7] Acret & Perrochet, Acret, Perrochet & Rabinow and Robert W. Robinow for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Harold W. Kennedy and John D. Maharg, County Counsel, Lloyd S. Davis, Assistant County Counsel, and Richard C. Greenberg, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday March 08, 1968

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

259 Cal.App.2d 860, 31098, Denham v. Los Angeles County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 67 Cal.2d 297, 28479, Driscoll v. City of Los Angeles
California - 67 Cal.2d 671, 29490, Tubbs v. Southern California Rapid Transit Dist.
California - 67 Cal.2d 695, 29439, Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.
California - 115 Cal.App.2d 684, 19257, Industrial Indem. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.
California - 126 Cal.App.2d 370, 20008, Hochfelder v. County of Los Angeles

See all quotations