258 N.W.2d 44 (Mich. 1977), 3, Massey v. Scripter

Citation: 258 N.W.2d 44, 401 Mich. 385

Opinion Judge: [401 Mich. 388] MOODY, Justice. Justice Williams, speaking for the majority in Zeni, considered the effect of an alleged violation of a statute by a party and stated the Michigan rule as follows:

Party Name: Lester B. MASSEY, Sr., and Wanda F. Massey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel SCRIPTER, Defendant-Appellee.

Attorney: [401 Mich. 387] Egnor & Hamilton by Ronald Wm. Egnor by Andrew S. Muth, Ypsilanti, for plaintiffs-appellants. DeVine, DeVine, Kantor & Serr by Allyn D. Kantor, for Daniel Scripter, defendant-appellee.

Case Date: Thursday October 06, 1977

Court: Michigan Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

258 N.W.2d 44 (Mich. 1977), 3, Massey v. Scripter

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Michigan - 12 N.W.2d 413 (Mich. 1943), 32, Davidson v. City of Detroit, Department of Street Railways
Michigan - 121 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. 1963), 70, Frederick v. City of Detroit, Dept. of St. Railways
Michigan - 133 N.W.2d 136 (Mich. 1965), 80, Felgner v. Anderson
Michigan - 185 N.W.2d 344 (Mich. 1971), 8, Boyd v. McKeever
Michigan - 216 N.W.2d 922 (Mich.App. 1974), 15357, Flager v. Associated Truck Lines, Inc.

See all quotations