257 P.2d 596 (Ariz. 1953), 5696, Martin v. Industrial Commission

Citation: 257 P.2d 596, 75 Ariz. 403

Opinion Judge: [9] Udall

Party Name: MARTIN et al. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al.

Attorney: [6] Mangum & Flick, Flagstaff, for petitioners. [7] Robert E. Yount, Phoenix, for respondent Industrial Commission. Perry M. Ling and Robert W. Pickrell, Phoenix, of counsel.

Case Date: Monday May 18, 1953

Court: Arizona Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

257 P.2d 596 (Ariz. 1953), 5696, Martin v. Industrial Commission

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Arizona - 203 P. 328 (Ariz. 1922), Civ. 1868, Sonora v. Morales
Arizona - 233 P. 1104 (Ariz. 1925), Civ. 2111, Crozier v. Noriega
Arizona - 267 P. 947 (Ariz. 1928), Civ. 2702, Otero v. Soto
Arizona - 286 P. 817 (Ariz. 1930), Civ. 2897, Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. De Johnson
Arizona - 110 P.2d 227 (Ariz. 1941), Civ. 4279, Phen v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.

See all quotations