257 Cal.App.2d 714, 24084, Johnson v. Mattox

Citation: 257 Cal.App.2d 714, 65 Cal.Rptr. 185

Opinion Judge: [10] Salsman

Party Name: Johnson v. Mattox

Attorney: [7] Eugene K. Lawlor for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Miller, Haygood & Critchfield, Mark L. Eaton, Merrill & Johnson and Richard W. Johnson for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday January 10, 1968

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

257 Cal.App.2d 714, 24084, Johnson v. Mattox

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 16 Cal.2d 142, 16942, San Diego T. & S. Bank v. San Diego
California - 64 Cal.2d 278, 22048, Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin County
California - 103 Cal.App.2d 187, 17842, Galich v. Brkich
California - 120 Cal.App.2d 237, 15619, E. A. Davis & Co. v. Richards
California - 93 Cal.App.2d 276, 13972, Norwood v. Judd

See all quotations