256 Cal.App.2d 56, 30448, Martindell v. Bodrero

Citation: 256 Cal.App.2d 56, 63 Cal.Rptr. 774

Opinion Judge: [10] Roth

Party Name: Martindell v. Bodrero

Attorney: [7] Pray, Price, Williams & Deatherage and William C. Price for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Kindel & Anderson and Malcolm G. Smith for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday November 16, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

256 Cal.App.2d 56, 30448, Martindell v. Bodrero

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 201 Cal. 219, S. F. 11413, P. A. Smith Co. v. Muller
California - 18 Cal.2d 530, 17249, Easton v. Ash
California - 45 Cal.2d 811, 23750, Seneris v. Haas
California - 49 Cal.2d 749, 24380, Halldin v. Usher
California - 112 Cal.App.2d 456, 8127, Crabbe v. Mires

See all quotations