256 Cal.App.2d 475, 8399, Philo v. Lancia

Citation: 256 Cal.App.2d 475, 63 Cal.Rptr. 900

Opinion Judge: [10] Tamura

Party Name: Philo v. Lancia

Attorney: [7] Wilson, Wilson & Borror and Caywood J. Borror for Defendant and Appellant. [8] King, Mussell & Garza and Florentino Garza for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday November 28, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

256 Cal.App.2d 475, 8399, Philo v. Lancia

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 188 Cal. 20, S. F. 9311, Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.
California - 216 Cal. 197, Sac. 4686, Girdner v. Union Oil Co. of California
California - 35 Cal.2d 16, 6023, Bonebrake v. McCormick
California - 38 Cal.2d 102, 22002, Selinsky v. Olsen
California - 38 Cal.2d 107, 22005, Peterson v. Burkhalter

See all quotations