254 N.W. 158 (Mich. 1934), 126, Oakland County v. Central West Cas. Co.

Citation: 254 N.W. 158, 266 Mich. 438

Opinion Judge: EDWARD M. SHARPE, Justice. In none of these cases was the precise issue of the instant controversy involved. Fraser v. Little was an action against a gratuitous surety on a replevin bond. The statute required a bond for double the assessed value of the chattel and might well have been supposed to furnish ample protection. Nevertheless, there was a

Party Name: OAKLAND COUNTY et al. v. CENTRAL WEST CASUALTY CO.

Attorney: [266 Mich. 439]Beaumont, Smith & Harris, of Detroit, for appellant. Arthur P. Bogue, Pros. Atty., and Robert D. Heitsch, Asst. Pros. Atty., both of Pontiac, for appellee Oakland County. Goodenough, Voorhies, Long & Ryan, of Detroit, for appellees John C. Spaulding and Irvin Long, receivers.

Judge Panel: NELSON SHARPE, C.J., and POTTER, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, BUTZEL, and BUSHNELL, JJ., concur.

Case Date: April 03, 1934

Court: Michigan Supreme Court