254 N.E.2d 384 (Ohio App. 9 Dist. 1969), In re Reed

Citation: 254 N.E.2d 384, 21 Ohio App.2d 1

Opinion Judge: HUNSICKER, Presiding Judge. HUNSICKER, P. J.

Party Name: In re REED, Judge.

Attorney: Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Donald A. Powell, Akron, for applicant, Tonia S. Gaylan., Alpeter, Diefenbach, Davies, Shaffer, Koerber & Lewis and Robert K. Lewis, Jr., Akron, for respondent. Messrs. Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, and Mr. Donald A. Powell, for applicant, Tonia S. Gayl...

Case Date: December 17, 1969

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

254 N.E.2d 384 (Ohio App. 9 Dist. 1969), In re Reed

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 295 U.S. 490 (1935), 773, Escoe v. Zerbst
Federal Cases - 389 U.S. 128 (1967), 16, Mempa v. Rhay
Ohio - 206 N.E.2d 217 (Ohio App. 2 Dist. 1965), State v. Curtis
Ohio - 237 N.E.2d 147 (Ohio App. 6 Dist. 1968), State v. Poffenbaugh