250 A.2d 329 (Conn.Super. 1968), 115540, Gimbel v. Loughlin

Citation: 250 A.2d 329, 28 Conn.Supp. 72

Opinion Judge: FITZ GERALD, Judge.

Party Name: Harold GIMBEL et al. v. Eugene S. LOUGHLIN et al.

Attorney: Sachs, Sachs, Giaimo & Sachs, New Haven, for plaintiffs. Wiggin & Dana, New Haven, for defendant The United Illuminating Co. Robert K. Killian, Atty. Gen., and John K. Jepson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants Eugene S. Loughlin and others (Public Utilities Commission).

Judge Panel: FITZ GERALD,

Case Date: April 22, 1968

Court: Connecticut Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

250 A.2d 329 (Conn.Super. 1968), 115540, Gimbel v. Loughlin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Maryland - 214 A.2d 146 (Md. 1965), 264, Deen v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co.
New Jersey - 173 A.2d 233 (N.J. 1961), A--34, In re Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.
Ohio - 226 N.E.2d 145 (Ohio App. 7 Dist. 1967), Cleveland Elec. Illuminating Co. v. City of Painesville
Pennsylvania - 105 A.2d 287 (Pa. 1954), Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair Tp.
Connecticut - 103 A.2d 535 (Conn. 1954), Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.

See all quotations