249 S.W.2d 491 (Mo.App. 1952), 28384, Veal v. Leimkuehler

Citation: 249 S.W.2d 491

Opinion Judge: HOUSER; PER CURIAM

Party Name: VEAL et al. v. LEIMKUEHLER et al

Attorney: Timothy R. Veal, St. Louis, pro se and for appellants. James E. Crowe, City Counselor, John P. McCammon, Associate City Counselor and John J. Shanahan, Asst. City Counselor, St. Louis, for respondents.

Judge Panel: BENNICK, P. J., and ANDERSON and RUDDY, JJ., concur.

Case Date: Tuesday May 20, 1952

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

249 S.W.2d 491 (Mo.App. 1952), 28384, Veal v. Leimkuehler

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Massachusetts - 247 Mass. 46 (1921), Byfield v. City of Newton
Maryland - 51 A.2d 269 (Md. 1947), 59, Hoffman v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Missouri - 159 S.W.2d 367 (Mo.App. 1942), In re Botz
Missouri - 197 S.W.2d 647 (Mo. 1946), 39927, Wood v. Wagner Elec. Corp.
Missouri - 220 S.W.2d 61 (Mo. 1949), 40227, State ex rel. Rice v. Public Service Com'n

See all quotations