249 Cal.App.2d 199, 29920, Frates v. Treder

Citation: 249 Cal.App.2d 199, 57 Cal.Rptr. 383

Opinion Judge: [10] Bishop

Party Name: Frates v. Treder

Attorney: [7] Finston, Kurtz & Schneider and Philip M. Kurtz for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] James R. Mead and Parker, Stanbury, McGee, Peckham & Garrett for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday March 06, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

249 Cal.App.2d 199, 29920, Frates v. Treder

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 22 Cal.2d 205, 18244, Hunstock v. Estate Development Corp.
California - 141 Cal.App.2d 246, 8704, Church v. Capital Freight Lines
California - 225 Cal.App.2d 476, 21185, Forslund v. Forslund
California - 230 Cal.App.2d 264, 21426, Crummer v. Whitehead
California - 36 Cal.App.2d 298, 11164, Lyydikainen v. Industrial Acc. Com.