249 Cal.App.2d 1006, 29117, Gilbert v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 249 Cal.App.2d 1006, 58 Cal.Rptr. 56

Opinion Judge: [10] Stephens

Party Name: Gilbert v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Hillel Chodos for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, Victor P. Spero and George J. Franscell, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday April 10, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

249 Cal.App.2d 1006, 29117, Gilbert v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 77 Cal. 319, 12580, Katz v. Bedford
California - 41 Cal.2d 70, 22543, Barrett v. City of Claremont
California - 42 Cal.2d 158, 22826, Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
California - 46 Cal.2d 818, 5813, People v. Watson
California - 55 Cal.2d 801, 26183, Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.

See all quotations