248 P.2d 732 (Colo. 1952), 16926, Beth Medrosh Hagodol v. City of Aurora

Citation: 248 P.2d 732, 126 Colo. 267

Opinion Judge: HOLLAND, Justice.

Party Name: BETH MEDROSH HAGODOL et al. v. CITY OF AURORA et al.

Attorney: Leslie A. Gifford, Aurora, for petitioners., Samuel J. Frazin, Donaldson, Hoffman & Goldstein, Denver, for respondents., HOLLAND, Justice., Upon the record as presented, it appears that in the last analysis, the only question that requires determination is the validity of the trial court's order ...

Case Date: Tuesday September 09, 1952

Court: Colorado Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

248 P.2d 732 (Colo. 1952), 16926, Beth Medrosh Hagodol v. City of Aurora

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Colorado - 235 P. 777 (Colo. 1925), 10912, City and County of Denver v. Tihen
Colorado - 69 P. 568 (Colo. 1902), Denver Power & Irrigation Co. v. Denver & R.G.R. Co.
Colorado - 156 P.2d 101 (Colo. 1945), 15497, City and County of Denver v. Board of Com'rs of Arapahoe County
Colorado - 201 P.2d 609 (Colo. 1948), 16087, Swift v. Smith
Colorado - 247 P.2d 137 (Colo. 1952), 16798, Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of Colo.

See all quotations