248 Cal.App.2d 798, 22442, Gardner v. City of San Jose

Citation: 248 Cal.App.2d 798, 57 Cal.Rptr. 176

Opinion Judge: [11] Devine

Party Name: Gardner v. City of San Jose

Attorney: [7] Ferdinand P. Palla, City Attorney, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Hoge, Scott Conley and Fenton, Jones & Appel for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Hilton J. Melby, City Attorney (Oakland), Kenneth W. Hoagland, City Attorney (Bakersfield), Harold A. Irish, City Attorney (Ukiah), Earl D. Murphy...

Case Date: Monday February 27, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

248 Cal.App.2d 798, 22442, Gardner v. City of San Jose

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 10 Cal.2d 519, 16409, Brown v. Regan
California - 28 Cal.2d 418, 19554, Harris v. Joffe
California - 39 Cal.2d 388, 22274, Scott v. Burke
California - 60 Cal.2d 431, 27485, Teall v. City of Cudahy
California - 124 Cal.App.2d 622, 15827, Hinton v. State of California

See all quotations