248 Cal.App.2d 699, 22956, Figone v. Statter

Citation: 248 Cal.App.2d 699, 56 Cal.Rptr. 762

Opinion Judge: [10] Salsman

Party Name: Figone v. Statter

Attorney: [7] Freitas, Allen, McCarthy & Bettini and Lloyd Tunik for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Bishop, Murray & Barry, G. William Filley, Pelton & Gunther and M. K. Taylor for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday February 21, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

248 Cal.App.2d 699, 22956, Figone v. Statter

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 173 Cal. 372, S. F. 6899, Scholle v. Finnell
California - 39 Cal. 565, 1,629, Dickey v. Davis
California - 41 Cal.2d 180, 22315, Gray v. Brinkerhoff
California - 102 Cal.App.2d 44, 4144, Tice v. Kaiser Co.
California - 110 Cal.App.2d 524, 14915, City of Daly City v. Smith

See all quotations