247 Cal.App.2d 40, 598, Espinoza v. Rossini

Citation: 247 Cal.App.2d 40, 55 Cal.Rptr. 205

Opinion Judge: [10] Gargano

Party Name: Espinoza v. Rossini

Attorney: [7] LaCoste, Keller & Strauss and Donald B. Cantwell for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Cardozo, Trimbur & Nickerson and A. A. Cardozo, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday December 07, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

247 Cal.App.2d 40, 598, Espinoza v. Rossini

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 29 Cal.2d 606, 19572, Combs v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.
California - 32 Cal.2d 193, 17708, County of Alameda v. Kuchel
California - 38 Cal.2d 102, 22002, Selinsky v. Olsen
California - 38 Cal.2d 107, 22005, Peterson v. Burkhalter
California - 39 Cal.2d 822, 22372, Farole v. Eichman

See all quotations