246 Cal.App.2d 231, 655, Fay v. Mundy

Citation: 246 Cal.App.2d 231, 54 Cal.Rptr. 591

Opinion Judge: [10] Conley

Party Name: Fay v. Mundy

Attorney: [7] Kinkle, Rodiger, Graf & Dewberry, Harney, Ford & Schlottman and Robert E. Ford for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Raymond & Keon, Raymond & Noriega and Robert L. Raymond for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: November 07, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

246 Cal.App.2d 231, 655, Fay v. Mundy

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 175 Cal. 13, S. F. 7287, Kinard v. Jordan
California - 181 Cal. 472, Sac. 2753, Raggio v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 21 Cal.2d 11, 18115, Judson v. Superior Court
California - 28 Cal.2d 61, 17225, Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior Court
California - 33 Cal.2d 908, 19610, City of Pasadena v. City of Alhambra

See all quotations