244 Cal.App.2d 260, 22886, Redevelopment Agency of City of Richmond v. Maynard

Citation: 244 Cal.App.2d 260, 53 Cal.Rptr. 42

Opinion Judge: [10] Shoemaker

Party Name: Redevelopment Agency of City of Richmond v. Maynard

Attorney: [7] Dixon & White, John F. Cruickshank, Jr., and Sandra H. Cox for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Carlson, Collins, Gordon & Bold and Frederick Bold, Jr., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday August 16, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

244 Cal.App.2d 260, 22886, Redevelopment Agency of City of Richmond v. Maynard

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 191 Cal. 364, S. F. 9869, American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.
California - 200 Cal. 419, Sac. 3954, A. Kenny v. Christianson
California - 1 Cal.2d 121, 4818, Development Co. v. Seaboard D. C. Corp.
California - 140 Cal.App.2d 316, 21182, Banco Mercantil v. Sauls Inc.
California - 193 Cal.App.2d 414, 19685, Redevelopment Agency of City and County of San Francisco v. Maxwell

See all quotations