244 A.2d 135 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1968), A--428, Bennett v. Gordon

Citation: 244 A.2d 135, 101 N.J.Super. 252

Opinion Judge: [10] Per Curiam

Party Name: Anne BENNETT and William Bennett, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Helen GORDON, Defendant-Respondent and Borough of East Paterson, Defendant-Appellant.

Attorney: [6] Mr. Leopold A. Monaco argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Lucien Baron, attorney).

Case Date: Thursday June 06, 1968

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

244 A.2d 135 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1968), A--428, Bennett v. Gordon

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 104 A. 194 (N.J.L. 1918), 58, Rose v. Slough
New Jersey - 169 A.2d 809 (N.J. 1961), A--66, Hayden v. Curley
New Jersey - 201 A.2d 726 (N.J. 1964), A--111, Amelchenko v. Borough of Freehold
New Jersey - 222 A.2d 649 (N.J. 1966), A--83, Hoy v. Capelli
New Jersey - 225 A.2d 105 (N.J. 1966), A--9, Visidor Corp. v. Borough of Cliffside Park

See all quotations