243 N.W. 327 (Wis. 1932), Dixon Shoe Company v. Moen

Citation: 243 N.W. 327, 208 Wis. 389

Opinion Judge: FOWLER, J.

Party Name: DIXON SHOE COMPANY, Respondent, v. MOEN, Administrator, imp., Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by Clancey, Loverud & Loverud of Stoughton, and oral argument by A. M. Loverud. On behalf of the appellant there was a brief by Grotophorst, Quale & Langer of Baraboo, attorneys for the defendants Melzl & McGann, and oral argument by Norman M. Quale. For the pl...

Case Date: Monday June 20, 1932

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court