242 Cal.App.2d 268, 22611, Hartman v. Burford

Citation: 242 Cal.App.2d 268, 51 Cal.Rptr. 309

Opinion Judge: [10] Salsman

Party Name: Hartman v. Burford

Attorney: [7] Hutchinson & Quattrin and J. Albert Hutchinson for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Burford, Hubler & Burford, Carr, McClellan, Ingersoll, Thompson & Horn, Luther M. Carr, David C. Carr and Thomas, Snell, Jamison, Russell, Williamson & Asperger, Alef & Schnitzer and Arthur Alef for Defendants and...

Case Date: Monday May 16, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

242 Cal.App.2d 268, 22611, Hartman v. Burford

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 175 Cal. 641, Sac. 2322, Ballou v. Avery
California - 71 Cal. 428, 9451, Fish v. Benson
California - 16 Cal.2d 516, 16436, Bank of California v. Superior Court
California - 19 Cal.2d 870, 16664, Connell v. Bowes
California - 57 Cal.2d 127, 26211, Ludwicki v. Guerin

See all quotations