241 Cal.App.2d 283, 22723, Bowles v. Antonetti

Citation: 241 Cal.App.2d 283, 50 Cal.Rptr. 370

Opinion Judge: [10] Salsman

Party Name: Bowles v. Antonetti

Attorney: [7] Donald O. May, Murphy & Adams, Landels, Ripley, Gregory & Diamond and Edward D. Landels for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Wool, Richardson & Colbert and James R. Sherman for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday March 31, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

241 Cal.App.2d 283, 22723, Bowles v. Antonetti

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 23 Cal.2d 303, 16947, Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals
California - 23 Cal.2d 381, 17363, Beals v. City of Los Angeles
California - 40 Cal.2d 317, 6377, Faulkner v. Cal. Toll Bridge Authority
California - 41 Cal.2d 235, 22656, Thompson v. City of Long Beach
California - 51 Cal.2d 423, 25113, City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

See all quotations