240 S.E.2d 639 (S.C. 1977), 20567, State v. Bamberg

Citation: 240 S.E.2d 639, 270 S.C. 77

Opinion Judge: NESS, Justice:

Party Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. Billy BAMBERG and Willis Brown, Appellants.

Attorney: Robert L. Hallman, Jr., of Jenkins, Perry & Pride, and Michael J. Thompson, of Columbia, for Appellants, cite: As to the Trial Court's having erred in refusing to quash the indictment against the Appellants upon the ground that they did not have benefit of an effective preliminary hearing: 360 U....

Case Date: December 14, 1977

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

240 S.E.2d 639 (S.C. 1977), 20567, State v. Bamberg

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 133 S.E.2d 320 (S.C. 1963), 18125, State v. White
South Carolina - 180 S.E.2d 341 (S.C. 1971), 19196, State v. Peterson
South Carolina - 198 S.E.2d 517 (S.C. 1973), 19680, State v. Batson
South Carolina - 238 S.E.2d 176 (S.C. 1977), 20525, State v. Posey
South Carolina - 88 S.E.2d 778 (S.C. 1955), 17048, State v. Shackelford