240 Cal.App.2d 891, 22269, Sweet v. Stutch

Citation: 240 Cal.App.2d 891, 50 Cal.Rptr. 9

Opinion Judge: [10] Draper

Party Name: Sweet v. Stutch

Attorney: [7] Peart, Baraty & Hassard and Robert D. Huber for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Philander Brooks Beadle and Marcus & Bresnahan for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday March 18, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

240 Cal.App.2d 891, 22269, Sweet v. Stutch

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 24 Cal.2d 654, L. A. 18842, Ash v. Mortensen
California - 26 Cal.2d 575, 17079, Lane v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
California - 124 Cal.App.2d 466, 19828, Rideau v. Los Angeles Transit Lines
California - 128 Cal.App.2d 564, 8467, Stevenson v. Link
California - 148 Cal.App.2d 927, 22058, Swift v. Winkler

See all quotations