240 A.2d 444 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1968), A--236, Dodd v. Copeland

Citation: 240 A.2d 444, 99 N.J.Super. 481

Opinion Judge: [9] Sullivan

Party Name: William DODD, Edward Dodd and Marion Elizabeth Dodd, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. George R. COPELAND, George D. Copeland, and Samuel J. Cox, Defendants, Samuel J. Cox and Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund, Appellants.

Attorney: [6] Mr. Bruce D. Herrigel argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Herrigel & Herrigel, attorneys).

Case Date: Thursday March 07, 1968

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

240 A.2d 444 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1968), A--236, Dodd v. Copeland

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 126 A.2d 161 (N.J. 1956), A-15, State v. Brown
New Jersey - 127 A.2d 161 (N.J. 1956), A-42, Giles v. Gassert
New Jersey - 129 A.2d 324 (N.J.Super. 1957), No. A--580, Lynch v. City of Newark
New Jersey - 134 A.2d 716 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1957), No. A--437, Lynch v. City of Newark
New Jersey - 138 A.2d 14 (N.J. 1958), A-57, Dixon v. Gassert

See all quotations