24 Cal.App.4th 178, A060031, Brydon v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.

Citation: 24 Cal.App.4th 178, 29 Cal.Rptr.2d 128

Opinion Judge: [11] Hodge

Party Name: Brydon v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.

Attorney: [7] Berding & Weil and James O. Devereaux for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Dianne K. Barry, Nancie Ryan and Verna P. Bromley for Defendants and Respondents. [9] McCormick, Kidman & Gehrens, Arthur G. Kidman and Janet R. Morningstar as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: April 18, 1994

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

24 Cal.App.4th 178, A060031, Brydon v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 464 U.S. 977 (1983), 83-465, Ronwin v. Supreme Court of Arizona
Federal Cases - 464 U.S. 977 (1983), 83-5567, Waterhouse v. Florida
California - 217 Cal. 673, L. A. 12834, Chow v. City of Santa Barbara
California - 67 Cal.2d 132, 22503, Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.
California - 22 Cal.3d 208, 23849, Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization

See all quotations