24 Cal.App.3d 361, 38786, Escrow Institute of Cal. v. Pierno

Citation: 24 Cal.App.3d 361, 100 Cal.Rptr. 880

Opinion Judge: [11] Ford

Party Name: Escrow Institute of Cal. v. Pierno

Attorney: [7] Conrad G. Tuohey and John A. McDermott II for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Arthur C. de Goede and Richard W. Bakke, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent. [9] Fulop, Rolston, Burns & McKittrick and Morton Rosen as Amici Curiae on behalf ...

Case Date: Monday March 27, 1972

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

24 Cal.App.3d 361, 38786, Escrow Institute of Cal. v. Pierno

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 15 Cal.2d 425, 4276, In re Fuller
California - 22 Cal.2d 494, 17734, People v. Western Fruit Growers
California - 29 Cal.2d 380, 17373, Del Mar Canning Co. v. Payne
California - 32 Cal.2d 378, 19311, County of L. A. v. Southern Cal. Tel. Co.
California - 34 Cal.2d 186, 17690, Accounting Corp. v. St. Bd. of Accountancy

See all quotations