239 N.E.2d 25 (Ohio 1968), 68-88, Board of Revision of Cuyahoga County v. Fodor

Citation: 239 N.E.2d 25, 15 Ohio St.2d 52

Opinion Judge: PAUL M. HERBERT, Judge. HERBERT, J.

Party Name: BOARD OF REVISION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al., Appellants, v. FODOR, Appellee.

Attorney: John T. Corrigan, Pros. Atty., Thomas P. Cyrus, Cleveland, and Adam P. Angelas, Fairview, for appellants., Burke, Haber & Berick, Jacob I. Rosenbaum and Joseph G. Berick, Cleveland, for appellee. Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Thomas P. Cyrus and Mr. Adam P. Angelas, for appella...

Judge Panel: TAFT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, C. WILLIAM O'NEILL, SCHNEIDER and PAUL W. BROWN, JJ., concur.

Case Date: Wednesday June 19, 1968

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

239 N.E.2d 25 (Ohio 1968), 68-88, Board of Revision of Cuyahoga County v. Fodor

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 162 N.E.2d 479 (Ohio 1959), 35975, Benedict v. Hamilton County Bd. of Revision
Ohio - 168 N.E.2d 404 (Ohio 1960), 36394, Hercules Galion Products, Inc. v. Bowers
Ohio - 193 N.E.2d 700 (Ohio 1963), 37820, Brennan v. Board of Tax Appeals
Ohio - 238 N.E.2d 554 (Ohio 1968), 41334, Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. v. Porterfield
Ohio - 37 N.E.2d 386 (Ohio 1941), 28631, Smith v. Board of Revision of Washington County

See all quotations