239 Cal.App.2d 438, 28052, Martin v. General Finance Co.

Citation: 239 Cal.App.2d 438, 48 Cal.Rptr. 773

Opinion Judge: [10] Ford

Party Name: Martin v. General Finance Co.

Attorney: [7] Flaxman & Coleman and Howard L. Rosoff for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Rosenfeld & Tucker and Manfred Rosenfeld for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: January 19, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

239 Cal.App.2d 438, 28052, Martin v. General Finance Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 184 F.Supp. 23 (E.D.N.Y. 1960), Civ. 19419, Field v. Lew
Federal Cases - 155 F.Supp. 615 (D.N.J. 1957), B-90-55, In re Atlas Foundry Co.
California - 53 Cal.2d 195, 6884, Leeper v. Beltrami
California - 166 Cal.App.2d 353, 22933, Southern Pacific Co. v. Fish
California - 186 Cal.App.2d 739, 18693, Burke v. Hibernia Bank

See all quotations