238 S.E.2d 215 (S.C. 1977), 20530, Worrell v. Satterfield Const. Co., Inc.

Citation: 238 S.E.2d 215, 269 S.C. 532

Opinion Judge: GREGORY, Justice.

Party Name: Richard Eugene WORRELL, Appellant, v. SATTERFIELD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., of South Carolina, Dickerson Incorporated, Marlboro Construction Company, Inc., and South Carolina State Highway Department, of which Satterfield Construction Company, Inc., is, Respondent.

Attorney: C. R. Pusser, Jr., of Chesterfield, for Appellant, cites: As to the Lower Court's having erred and abused its discretion in permitting the Respondent, Satterfield Construction Company, Inc., of S. C., to answer the Plaintiff's Complaint after the time for answering had expired: 266 S.C. 517, 224 ...

Case Date: October 18, 1977

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

238 S.E.2d 215 (S.C. 1977), 20530, Worrell v. Satterfield Const. Co., Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 125 S.E.2d 353 (S.C. 1962), 17904, Lee v. Peek
South Carolina - 135 S.E.2d 94 (S.C. 1964), 18172, Irick v. Carr
South Carolina - 174 S.E.2d 163 (S.C. 1970), 19046, Livingston v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.
South Carolina - 197 S.E.2d 91 (S.C. 1973), 19635, Scruggs v. Ballenger Corp.
South Carolina - 207 S.E.2d 820 (S.C. 1974), 19879, Hedgepath v. State Highway Dept.