236 P.2d 115 (Colo. 1951), 16378, Parrish v. Hainlen

Citation: 236 P.2d 115, 124 Colo. 229

Opinion Judge: CLARK, Justice.

Party Name: PARRISH et al. v. HAINLEN (two cases).

Attorney: Wood & Ris and Max P. Zall, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error., Mabry, Mabry & Mabry, Trinidad, for defendant in error. [124 Colo. 230] Wood & Ris and Max P. Zall, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Case Date: Monday September 17, 1951

Court: Colorado Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

236 P.2d 115 (Colo. 1951), 16378, Parrish v. Hainlen

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Colorado - 235 P. 373 (Colo. 1925), 11002, Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co.
Colorado - 151 P.2d 757 (Colo. 1944), 15353, Esquibel v. City and County of Denver
Colorado - 236 P.2d 121 (Colo. 1951), 16475, Richardson v. Richardson
Colorado - 25 P.2d 719 (Colo. 1933), 13032, Gotch v. K. & B. Packing & Provision Co.
Kentucky - 174 S.W.2d 19 (Ky.App. 1943), Dixon v. Kentucky Utilities Co.

See all quotations