234 Cal.App.3d 1385, E008114, McCulloch v. Ford Dealers Advertising Assn.

Citation: 234 Cal.App.3d 1385, 286 Cal.Rptr. 223

Opinion Judge: [10] Ramirez

Party Name: McCulloch v. Ford Dealers Advertising Assn.

Attorney: [7] Nielsen & Glover and Sherry K. Salls for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Bruggeman, Smith & Peckham, Martin J. DeVries and George Bruggeman, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: October 03, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

234 Cal.App.3d 1385, E008114, McCulloch v. Ford Dealers Advertising Assn.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 49 Cal.2d 647, 19757, Biakanja v. Irving
California - 11 Cal.3d 1, 7976, D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners
California - 276 Cal.App.2d 680, 9332, Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.
California - 195 Cal.App.3d 1119, G004430, Walters v. Seventeen Magazine
California - 212 Cal.App.3d 468, D007483, Yanase v. Automobile Club of So. Cal.

See all quotations