234 Cal.App.2d 435, 21552, Scott v. John E. Branagh and Son

Citation: 234 Cal.App.2d 435, 44 Cal.Rptr. 384

Opinion Judge: [11] Shoemaker

Party Name: Scott v. John E. Branagh and Son

Attorney: [7] J. Adrian Palmquist, Alfred A. Affinito and Francis T. Cornish for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Wagener, Jewett, Lynch, Sutton & Curran, Wagener, Lynch & Curran and Donald W. Curran for Intervener and Appellant. [9] Weinmann, Rode, Burnhill & Moffitt and Cyril Viadro for Defendant and Respond...

Case Date: May 18, 1965

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

234 Cal.App.2d 435, 21552, Scott v. John E. Branagh and Son

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 216 Cal. 397, Sac. 4553, In re Lances' Estate
California - 44 Cal.2d 649, 23538, Pauly v. King
California - 53 Cal.2d 347, 20249, Florez v. Groom Development Co.
California - 113 Cal.App.2d 673, 18954, Revels v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.
California - 129 Cal.App.2d 278, 20148, Raich v. Aldon Construction Co.

See all quotations