232 Cal.App.3d 88, B043903, Mancuso v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.

Citation: 232 Cal.App.3d 88, 283 Cal.Rptr. 300

Opinion Judge: [10] Croskey

Party Name: Mancuso v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.

Attorney: [7] Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust, Darryl A. De Cuir and Clay Robbins III for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Hill, Farrer & Burrill, William M. Bitting, Dean E. Dennis and William A. White for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: July 11, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

232 Cal.App.3d 88, B043903, Mancuso v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 180 Cal. 723, L. A. 4919, Minter v. San Diego Consolidated Gas & Electric Co.
California - 26 Cal.2d 519, 19187, Polk v. City of Los Angeles
California - 49 Cal.2d 652, 24631, Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.
California - 58 Cal.2d 292, 20943, DiMare v. Cresci
California - 59 Cal.2d 57, 26976, Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.

See all quotations