231 S.W.2d 345 (Tenn. 1950), Clouse v. Garfinkle

Citation: 231 S.W.2d 345, 190 Tenn. 677

Opinion Judge: [44] NEIL, Chief Justice (dissenting).

Party Name: CLOUSE v. GARFINKLE et al.

Attorney: [8] For the Complainant Clouse, it is insisted that the City, by condemnation for street purposes, acquired only an easement in the land, and that when by resolution, the City evidenced its abandonment of the surplus triangle, that there was a reverter to Mrs. Hicks, and that she therefore convey...

Case Date: Friday March 17, 1950

Court: Tennessee Supreme Court